نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه فقه و حقوق، جامعه المصطفی العالمیه، قم، ایران
2 سطح چهار رشته فقه قضایی، جامعه المصطفی العالمیه، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The increasing progress of human knowledge in the fields of medicine has opened new jurisprudential windows in jurisprudential chapters and topics. The possibility of continuing human life with the removal of some internal organs, as well as the possibility of accurately estimating the damage caused to the internal organs and the possibility of treating said injuries, has made the need to review the internal organs’ blood money inevitable. Since, until recent decades, such injuries often led to the death of the victim, compensation for such injuries was not studied independently, but was considered under the title of compensation for the soul. Now, with the development of the boundaries of knowledge and the possibility of the survival of the injured despite the damage or injuries to the internal organs, this important question is raised whether it is possible to extend the rule of the blood money of even and odd organs to the internal organs? In this context, there are three approaches; Opponents of the paying blood money for the internal organs, those in favor of paying it and considering them as the main organs and those who oppose paying it for non-main organs. In the upcoming research, we will examine the opinions of the opponents of paying blood money for the internal organs and study their arguments. Finally, by criticizing the arguments of the opponents, we will decide upon the rulings regarding the internal organs.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)