نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی نراق،مرکزی،ایران
2 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی،دانشگاه قم،قم،ایران
3 دانش آموخته سطح سه حوزه علمیه قم،قم،ایران(دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی)
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The practice of witnesses recanting their testimony is widespread in societies, particularly in financial, criminal, and family lawsuits. Witness recantation in each of these legal contexts involves various assumptions and scenarios, each carrying its own set of rules, conditions, and consequences. This research delves into the cases of witness recantation and its associated rulings and consequences in Imamiyeh and Hanafi jurisprudence through a comparative lens. The exploration aims to highlight both the commonalities and differences between these two religious perspectives, fostering convergence and rectifying biased preconceptions. In many instances, the opinions of jurists from both religions align, such as the lack of witness responsibility in recanting testimony before a verdict is issued in financial, criminal, and family cases. However, subtle differences exist. For instance, Hanafi jurisprudence categorically deems witnesses as guarantors for compensation in cases of murder or dismemberment. In contrast, Imamiyeh jurisprudence holds witnesses accountable for compensation if they provide false testimony due to an error, while intentional false testimony warrants retaliation upon the request of the victim's family. This article explores additional points of convergence and divergence between these two legal traditions.
کلیدواژهها [English]
* قرآن کریم.
75. وزارة الاوقاف و الشئون الإسلامیه. (1404ق). الموسوعة الفقهیة الکویتیة، کویت: دارالسلاسل