نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، پژوهشکده تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی (سمت)، تهران، ایران
2 دانش‌آموخته دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Regarding the ownership of reclaimed deserted lands, two main jurisprudential theories exist. The first theory posits that the ownership relationship of the Imam (PBUH) over deserted lands persists both during his presence and occultation. In this view, the reclaimer is merely more entitled than others to possess and utilize such lands. Some contemporary jurists, emphasizing the Imam’s role, have substituted the Islamic government’s authority for the Imam’s ownership and significantly supported the government’s sovereignty over deserted lands. The second theory asserts that during the occultation, the Imam’s ownership over deserted lands is severed. Consequently, after completing the reclamation process, the reclaimer becomes the rightful owner of both the land and the constructed edifices.
This study, employing an analytical-jurisprudential methodology and exploring the corresponding legal dimensions, examines the arguments presented by proponents of both theories. The findings suggest that, based on the implications of affirmative and continuity narrations, reclaiming deserted lands during the occultation does not sever the Imam’s or the Islamic government’s ownership relationship. Instead, the reclaimer is deemed more entitled to possession and is recognized as the owner of any constructed edifices. Implementing the jurists’ perspective, which upholds the ownership of deserted lands for the Imam (PBUH) or the Islamic government, is not feasible without the establishment of an Islamic government and adherence to the theory of the Guardianship of the Jurist (Velayat-e Faqih).
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
مقالات
)